Mikä haaste/ongelma käsiteltiin?
In Spain we find ourselves with a serious delay in the capacity of the different agents of the forestry sector to apply and internalize innovations, if not even good practices that have been technically accepted for a long time.
Miten ratkaisit ongelman?
To face this challenge, what we have called a Networked Forest Management Support System is being designed in the form of a: “Service”, functioning under an autonomous approach.
Mitkä ovat menestystekijät ongelman ratkaisemisessa?
1- Massive participation
2- Public bodies involvement and participation
3- Wide media coverage actions
4 Synergies build up
5.- Multi-parties involvement
Odottamaton epäonnistuminen, jos mitään.
1- Lack of involvement from public bodies in so many scenarios. This happened to be a handicap as it undermine daily teams work.
Opittua
1- Special care must be taken on public involvement as they can improve and reinforce results in so many ways.
2 Sociological support was lacking and rural communities required an specialised support due to their reluctantness and distrust to new methods or proposals.
Mikä rooli neuvonantajalla tai neuvontapalvelulla on käytännön tapauksessa?
In our case, in which we have wanted to design an innovative, autonomous, self-governing and self-financed advisory service, the role of the technical advisors rests in the core of the project.
Voidaanko lähestymistapasi siirtää ja/tai mukauttaa muihin innovaatiohaasteisiin ja -alueisiin?
Joo
Arvioitu siirrettävyys asteikolla alkaen 1 kohtaan 5
(missä 1 on helppoa ja 5 hyvin vaikea)
3
Kokemuksen jakamiseksi on the good practice, please contact Jesús Martínez Ben (jesus.martinez@fmc-galicia.com)