Quel était le défi/problème abordé?
In Spain we find ourselves with a serious delay in the capacity of the different agents of the forestry sector to apply and internalize innovations, if not even good practices that have been technically accepted for a long time.
Comment as-tu résolu le problème?
To face this challenge, what we have called a Networked Forest Management Support System is being designed in the form of a: “Service”, functioning under an autonomous approach.
Quels sont les facteurs de succès pour résoudre le problème?
1- Massive participation
2- Public bodies involvement and participation
3- Wide media coverage actions
4 Synergies build up
5.- Multi-parties involvement
Échecs inattendus, si seulement.
1- Lack of involvement from public bodies in so many scenarios. This happened to be a handicap as it undermine daily teams work.
Leçons apprises
1- Special care must be taken on public involvement as they can improve and reinforce results in so many ways.
2 Sociological support was lacking and rural communities required an specialised support due to their reluctantness and distrust to new methods or proposals.
Quel rôle joue le conseiller ou le service de conseil dans le cas pratique?
In our case, in which we have wanted to design an innovative, autonomous, self-governing and self-financed advisory service, the role of the technical advisors rests in the core of the project.
Votre approche peut-elle être transférée et/ou adaptée à d'autres défis d'innovation et régions?
Oui
Transférabilité estimée sur une échelle de 1 pour 5
(où 1 est facile et 5 très difficile)
3
Pour partager l'expériencesur la bonne pratique, please contact Jesús Martínez Ben (jesus.martinez@fmc-galicia.com)