Kāds bija izaicinājums/ problēma, kas tika risināta?
In Spain we find ourselves with a serious delay in the capacity of the different agents of the forestry sector to apply and internalize innovations, if not even good practices that have been technically accepted for a long time.
Kā jūs atrisinājāt problēmu?
To face this challenge, what we have called a Networked Forest Management Support System is being designed in the form of a: “Service”, functioning under an autonomous approach.
Kādi ir veiksmes faktori problēmas risināšanā?
1- Massive participation
2- Public bodies involvement and participation
3- Wide media coverage actions
4 Synergies build up
5.- Multi-parties involvement
Negaidītas neveiksmes, ja kāds.
1- Lack of involvement from public bodies in so many scenarios. This happened to be a handicap as it undermine daily teams work.
Gūtās mācības
1- Special care must be taken on public involvement as they can improve and reinforce results in so many ways.
2 Sociological support was lacking and rural communities required an specialised support due to their reluctantness and distrust to new methods or proposals.
Kāda loma padomniekam vai konsultāciju dienestam ir praktiskajā gadījumā?
In our case, in which we have wanted to design an innovative, autonomous, self-governing and self-financed advisory service, the role of the technical advisors rests in the core of the project.
Vai jūsu pieeja var tikt pārnesta un/vai pielāgota citiem jauninājumu izaicinājumiem un reģioniem?
Jā
Paredzamā nododamība mērogā no 1 Ļoti svarīga būs arī Štīrijas Lauksaimniecības kameras loma pēc projekta beigām, lai rezultātus izplatītu pēc iespējas plašāk 5
(kur 1 ir viegli un 5 ļoti grūti)
3
Par pieredzes apmaiņu on the good practice, please contact Jesús Martínez Ben (jesus.martinez@fmc-galicia.com)